In a recent episode of First Dates airing on TV screens, a heated argument over who should foot the bill during a first date sparked a debate on social media.
The debate over the man insisting on paying the full bill erupted on social media platforms, drawing attention from viewers.
First Dates, a beloved TV show for over a decade, witnesses a heated argument in a 2018 episode. Cecilia, 23, and Viv, 26, engage in a memorable debate over who should foot the bill.
In the episode, Cecilia sparked debate after adamantly arguing about splitting the bill, and facing Viv's insistence on paying in full, claiming it's an act of chivalry.
The dispute escalates as Cecilia questions the rationality behind traditional gender roles.
Cecilia said, "Give me one rational reason why you should.
"There's no rational reason why a woman shouldn't pay."
While Viv reponded: "I think she’s realised I’m just as stubborn as she is, and she’s frankly going to have to get used to that if this is going to carry on."
In a post-date interview, Cecilia expressed her frustration, calling the argument irrational, unnecessary, and uncalled for.
She lamented that most men judge her by her appearance, despite her regular involvement in parliamentary sessions.
On the other hand, Viv acknowledged Cecilia's stubbornness, suggesting that she would have to get used to it if their relationship were to continue.
Eventually, the pair agreed to split the bill at the end of the date, a decision that sparked various reactions from viewers.
Viewers' responses vary, with some siding with Viv, emphasizing the gesture's chivalrous intent. Conversely, others applaud Cecilia's assertiveness, seeing it as a stand for equality and respect.
In today's modern dating scene, discussions on social media have intensified, reigniting the age-old debate on bill payments and reflecting broader conversations on gender equality and traditional norms.
Cecilia and Viv's clash exemplifies the complexities of navigating relationships in today's society.
The post read: "Let's revisit the conversation about who pays the bill on the first date."
In the comment selection, many opinions are divided. Some argue that men should foot the full bill for the first date, while others disagree. Those in favor of equal contributions suggest that women should share the expenses for their dates.
One person said: As a male you gotta be diverse tho, you can’t just speak male dominant issues.The ability to hold a conversation is extremely important and sexy. Yes physicality matters, but in the grand scheme of things, beauty is the first thing to fade.
A second wrote: Unfortunately some people treat it as a test. You can find stories and “aadvise” post/articles telling women to offer as a test and that passing means the guy insists on paying.
While a third commented: It says men expect men to pay for dates more than women expect men to pay for dates.
Another added: I always offer to split. I don't mind splitting and will keep dating them if we split the check it just makes me feel special if he pays.
Just me personally. Last guy I dated we took turns. He paid one evening. I paid the next time. Or whomever chose the place paid.
Someone else said: I know tons of broke college girls who just go on dates with guys just for free dinner with no other intentions.
What did you think about this topic?
